China’s equity market has performed poorly for quite some time. It is a big chunk of the EEM index, and as such, has weighed on the vehicles’ returns, but not as much as you might think, given India’s (another large weighting) stellar run.

The proximate cause has been China’s embattled property development sector, where fears of a burgeoning bubble (and indeed there is one) led to a crackdown on credit, namely the three “hard lines” of gearing, relating to liquidity, net debt, and servicing metrics.

Evergrande has been the highest profile casualty of the crackdown, where a lack of rollover financing means projects can’t complete and half completed projects are worth nothing to no-one, which means that builders presently building your projects fear they won’t get paid either, and down tools in the now, and as such the whole thing collapses.

The end result has been carnage for the China proportion of the high yield USD denominated market.

And more spectacularly so for China’s residential exposures.

However, fearing an unorderly unwind, and credit contagion into other, unaffected sectors, China’s authorities have relaxed some of these “hard line” requirements, allowing M&A as an acceptable reason to breach the threshold, such that healthier, stronger balance sheets might absorb the assets of the weaker players, stabilise the sector, and prevent a run on apartments from taking the sector with it.

These measures have been greeted with a stabilisation in yields, as a partial indicator of their success.

The other key reason for underperformance has related to state intervention into private markets, with the authorities declaring what sectors could extract a profit (e.g. banning portions of for-profit education) and how exclusively / how much (e.g. Tencent, Alibaba) as a function of market power.

Relatedly, minimum wage and working conditions were imposed (Meituan, Didi), and the combination of these measured greatly impacted valuations across many of China’s largest companies.

Putting both events together, and perhaps adding a COVID-related overlay, we see a market that is quite cheap by international comparison.

Noting that earnings growth has been quite comparable to other countries.

Gearing overall continues to be a problem, but the size of China’s foreign reserves (~+$3tn USD) does mean that China is unlikely to be vulnerable to the “sudden stop” balance of payments type crisis that can make emerging market equities so risky.

Likewise, the acceptance of lower growth targets going forwards, as a means of shifting income away from traditional drivers of growth (fixed asset investment and property development) and towards domestic consumption (household share of GDP, household expenditure, retail sales) could auger well for China’s fortunes, with a healthier balance of GDP and less “bezzle”, as China commentator Michael Pettis would put it.


If China’s regulatory interventions are behind it (having achieved their desired effects) and the property market stabilised (relatively speaking) valuations could well be quite attractive, in the current market.

Important Information: This document has been prepared by Aequitas Investment Partners ABN 92 644 165 266 (“Aequitas”, “our”, “we”), a Corporate Authorised Representative (no. 1284389) of C2 Financial Services, (Australian Financial Services Licensee no. 502171), and is for distribution within Australia to wholesale clients and financial advisers only.

This document is based on information available at the time of publishing, information which we believe is correct and any opinions, conclusions or forecasts are reasonably held or made as at the time of its compilation, but no warranty is made as to its accuracy, reliability or completeness. To the extent permitted by law, neither Aequitas nor any of its affiliates accept liability to any person for loss or damage arising from the use of the information herein.

Please note that past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

General Advice Warning: This document has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs, and therefore you should consider its appropriateness, having regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs. Before making any decision about whether to acquire a financial product, you should obtain and read the relevant Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) or Investor Directed Portfolio Service Guide (IDPS Guide) and consider talking to a financial adviser.

Taxation warning: Any taxation considerations are general and based on present taxation laws and may be subject to change. Aequitas is not a registered tax (financial) adviser under the Tax Agent Services Act 2009 and investors should seek tax advice from a registered tax agent or a registered tax (financial) adviser if they intend to rely on this information to satisfy the liabilities or obligations or claim entitlements that arise, or could arise, under a taxation law.

Receive our investment insights

Something went wrong. Please check your entries and try again.