For all the excitement about oil, it is sitting around where you might expect, just by eyeballing the average of the past 21 years.

There was a supply shakeout in 2014, and a slight rise since then from modest supply discipline, and modestly higher demand.


Hamilton, Ben Bernanke, and Beckworth, amongst other academics, have tabled simple oil pricing (explaining is a better word) models several times over the years.

The idea is to explain the price of oil by splitting common demand side factors (e.g. movements in copper, VIX, credit spreads, and changes in the 10 year treasury yields) in an econometric model, and attribute the residual (the unexplained component) to supply side movements.

The demand side co-movements give us the “predicted” value (in logs, everything in economics is logs, which we then re-exponentiate at the very end), which we compare to movements in the actual price. The spread between them (getting wider, getting smaller) is the supply response.

That shows us that in 2014, a big chunk of the oil price drop was demand (~50%), and the other half was supply. That supply story was the OPEC+ response, effectively trying to drive US shale into bankruptcy. Incidentally, they more or less succeeded, the industry went bankrupt twice in 5 years, and really everybody outside of the end consumer lost.

Such a model would also suggests that 2021 saw a material recovery in demand, which we all know was associated with the reopening / end of lockdowns.

The last 5 minutes have been a function of some demand hit (Omicron) and some supply hits (the strategic petroleum reserve release ructions, led by the White House, China, India and others).

So what’s the point. Well, oil at $65 seems to be about right. Anything higher is great for producers.

$65bbl is what Woodside (WPL) use in their modelling for the newly approved Scarborough LNG project. $65bbl is also where the back end of the futures curve sits. That’s not surprising, everyone’s forecasts influence everyone else’s.

There is a worry, in a manner similar to what’s happened with the price of coal, that is worth articulating, and it works as follows.

Everyone “knows” that demand for coal will eventually decline to zero, as renewables take over. That reduces the incentive to bring on new supply in the future. Perversely enough, that means, as coal reserves deplete and are not replaced, that supply can “gap down” below demand, creating huge pricing pressures.

That is what we’ve seen with coal, where prices more than tripled, and remain well above longer run averages, even though no-one believes that coal has a multi-decade future, if climate change pressures hold. That dynamic is playing out for natural gas, as well, and is leading to what’s been termed the European energy crisis.

If you are a producer, that sort of backdrop, oddly enough, can be quite appealing, and, from a portfolio perspective, we own energy stocks as a hedge against this sort of dynamic playing out. That, and we find the valuations fairly compelling.

Important Information: This document has been prepared by Aequitas Investment Partners ABN 92 644 165 266 (“Aequitas”, “our”, “we”), a Corporate Authorised Representative (no. 1284389) of C2 Financial Services, (Australian Financial Services Licensee no. 502171), and is for distribution within Australia to wholesale clients and financial advisers only.

This document is based on information available at the time of publishing, information which we believe is correct and any opinions, conclusions or forecasts are reasonably held or made as at the time of its compilation, but no warranty is made as to its accuracy, reliability or completeness. To the extent permitted by law, neither Aequitas nor any of its affiliates accept liability to any person for loss or damage arising from the use of the information herein.

Please note that past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

General Advice Warning: This document has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs, and therefore you should consider its appropriateness, having regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs. Before making any decision about whether to acquire a financial product, you should obtain and read the relevant Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) or Investor Directed Portfolio Service Guide (IDPS Guide) and consider talking to a financial adviser.

Taxation warning: Any taxation considerations are general and based on present taxation laws and may be subject to change. Aequitas is not a registered tax (financial) adviser under the Tax Agent Services Act 2009 and investors should seek tax advice from a registered tax agent or a registered tax (financial) adviser if they intend to rely on this information to satisfy the liabilities or obligations or claim entitlements that arise, or could arise, under a taxation law.

Receive our investment insights

Something went wrong. Please check your entries and try again.