If consensus expectations come to pass, that’s a good equity risk premia (ERP) to allocate capital against. Note the tech wreck, where the ERP was a terrible-no-good deal, as a bit of baseline.
How plausible those underlying estimates prove to be, is a function of whether monetary policy is still “in train”, to a highly significant degree, as some commentators think (e.g., “we’ve scarcely seen the impact, yet”) which would be bad…
…or, whether it is more or less (these days) instantaneously transmitted (“long and variable” meets “swift and highly predictable”), which would be less bad, as the impacts are already felt, and don’t represent an additional overhang, to the above.
Those earnings are elevated pretty much everywhere, not just a “US exuberant analyst thing”, so the concern of overtightening, and the impact on margin, is relevant wherever you look…
…and margins would seem vulnerable on at least two fronts. One is that the tight labour market means wages eat into margins, and two, that the higher interest rates cause a slowdown that impacts sales and revenue and thus profits.
I suppose you could even have three, which is 1 & 2 essentially combined, where tighter policy causes activity to slow, but firms that are reluctant to let go of employees given how tough/tight/hard it has been over the past 2 years to find workers, choose to hang on to them, thus eating margin all the quicker than in either scenario.
This is the “labour hoarding” hypothesis.
Our view. We don’t know.
Sometimes we know. Sometimes we think we know. This is one of those times where we think we might know. Note the italics, they are doing a lot of the heavy lifting here.
In our view, the soft landing outcome is most likely. China is reopening. Germany is somehow powering along, despite energy. The US labour market outcomes seem to be cooling, without a rise in unemployment. Even some of the housing data looked fractionally better, in terms of mortgage applications.
But the soft landing looks exactly like the hard landing, at the start, so you can’t really analyse the macroeconomic tea leaves, in the way you normally can, and history is not on anyone’s side (soft landings have occurred…virtually never).
So, we are diversified. Some floating rate debt, some duration, some credit. Geographically we are dispersed in our equities, with some value tilts on. Equities in aggregate is close to our SAA. We have a goodly amount of cash, and alternatives. Property is also close to the SAA, having narrowed it post the very large drawdown in REITs.
Important Information: This document has been prepared by Aequitas Investment Partners ABN 92 644 165 266 (“Aequitas”, “our”, “we”), a Corporate Authorised Representative (no. 1284389) of C2 Financial Services, (Australian Financial Services Licensee no. 502171), and is for distribution within Australia to wholesale clients and financial advisers only.
This document is based on information available at the time of publishing, information which we believe is correct and any opinions, conclusions or forecasts are reasonably held or made as at the time of its compilation, but no warranty is made as to its accuracy, reliability or completeness. To the extent permitted by law, neither Aequitas nor any of its affiliates accept liability to any person for loss or damage arising from the use of the information herein.
Please note that past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
General Advice Warning: This document has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs, and therefore you should consider its appropriateness, having regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs. Before making any decision about whether to acquire a financial product, you should obtain and read the relevant Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) or Investor Directed Portfolio Service Guide (IDPS Guide) and consider talking to a financial adviser.
Taxation warning: Any taxation considerations are general and based on present taxation laws and may be subject to change. Aequitas is not a registered tax (financial) adviser under the Tax Agent Services Act 2009 and investors should seek tax advice from a registered tax agent or a registered tax (financial) adviser if they intend to rely on this information to satisfy the liabilities or obligations or claim entitlements that arise, or could arise, under a taxation law.